No dilemma, Apple is a hardware company

John Gru­ber of Dar­ing Fire­ball points to this arti­cle at the WSJ: Apple Has an Iden­tity Cri­sis: Is It a Hard­ware Com­pany or a Soft­ware Firm? Gru­ber notes that this dichotomy has been true every one of Apple’s 37 years.

But I beg to dif­fer. There is no dilemma. This has never been true. Back when I used to write about Apple, twenty years ago, and today, it is quite clear: Every­thing Apple does is about sell­ing hard­ware. You can set your watch, your rumor mill, and your stock options by this.

If they don’t think it will fur­ther hard­ware sales, they won’t do it.

iTunes Match Airport Wall Wart

Delight­ful name, no?

I would like Apple to build a wall wart1 that con­nects to my iTunes Match account (nee, my iCloud account) to stream music.

It should be very much like an Air­port Express, being wall-wartish, and hav­ing an audio out option, but it should be pur­pose built to con­nect to my music in my Apple ecosys­tem. I would set it up via my Apple i(OS)X device, con­nect to my WiFi, log in to iCloud, save my cre­den­tials, and it would be ready to go.

This magic wart would then let me lis­ten to my music, via iTunes Match, with­out a com­puter or a copy of iTunes run­ning. I wouldn’t have to plug my iPhone in any­where, or use minutes/battery to stream music. I wouldn’t have to “Start iTunes, Honey, so we can lis­ten to music.” I could still use Remote (or iTunes on OSX?) to skip, pick a playlist, etc.

How sweet would that be?

Really sweet.

Bonus, it would be ready for iRa­dio, or what­ever Apple calls their even­tual stream­ing music service.

Yes, I know this is very spe­cific to the Apple ecosys­tem. And it would be fab if Apple would let you con­nect it to Pandora/Rdio/Spotify/whatnot, but Apple would never do that. On the other side, Apple would never allow a third party wall wart to con­nect to iTunes Match, so. I am, in my cir­cum­stances, stuck with Apple. I can live with that.

But I can’t live with­out this thing. Build it, Apple!


  1. wall wart (n): elec­tronic nub­bin with plug prongs on the back that you plug into the wall where it sits like a par­a­sitic lump, doing “some­thing.” 

In Defense of Apple’s Maps

We got iPhones 5 a few weeks ago now, and I have been very pleased with it. The extra screen space is nice (the key­board doesn’t cover every­thing up now!) and the speed is espe­cially welcome.

But my favorite fea­ture, by far, is the new Maps app.

We’ve been liv­ing in Kansas City (KS) for a lit­tle less than a year at this point. I don’t know my way around ter­ri­bly well. I had been using Nav­igon for GPS rout­ing and it was… well, awful. Hard to start (slow, obnox­ious address entry), hard to man­age (vol­ume was always set to “whis­per”, see­ing the entire route was painfully slow, and end­ing nav­i­ga­tion was not easy to do), and the spo­ken direc­tions were too fre­quent and annoy­ing. I never used it because by the time I knew I wanted it, I was often already dri­ving, and stop­ping for ten min­utes by the side of the road to find the address and enter it was not going to be help­ful. Although I did that once or twice.

In con­trast, Apple’s new Maps app, in com­bi­na­tion with Siri, does exactly what I hoped it would. Easy to find des­ti­na­tions, often just by voice request. Imme­di­ate startup of turn-by-turn direc­tions. Clear maps, just enough voice direc­tion, easy overview, resume, and end func­tions. What­ever prob­lems Siri or Maps have, I don’t feel them here in KCK. I have used turn-by-turn direc­tions more in the last few weeks than I did in the pre­vi­ous two years. Heck, some­times I do it just for fun.

So, count me a fan.

Make it easier for me, Amazon!

Went to buy some­thing at Ama­zon tonight, and decided they really need to let us add a nick­name or notes to our pay­ment meth­ods. I’d like to call my pay­ment meth­ods “Golf card” and “Reg­u­lar card” and “White card,” but instead all I get to dis­tin­guish my credit cards are the last four num­bers, which mean vir­tu­ally noth­ing to me, but it mean a whole lot to my banks, and to my like­li­hood of hav­ing enough funds to buy what I wanted to buy tonight. Instead, I have to labo­ri­ously haul out the wal­let. Make it eas­ier for me, Amazon!

AT&T or Verizon for my new iPhone? (Updated answer: AT&T)

Updated! — dis­count on Vz, too!
Update #2 — no voice+data on Vz
Update #3 — done and done

Hi all. Back to the mun­dane. Apple announced (or rather, con­firmed what we’ve all known for sev­eral months now) a new iPhone today. The iPhone 5 will be avail­able for pre-order this Fri­day, to ship a week later. I will be get­ting one, as will my wife, as we lurve our cur­rent iPhones 4, we are out of con­tract, and we would like faster more capa­ble phones.

There are three car­ri­ers avail­able to us: AT&T (our cur­rent car­rier), Ver­i­zon (with whom we carrier-ed for a decade before we got iPhones), and Sprint (actu­ally a home­town com­pany here in KC).

Sprint is out right away for poor cov­er­age and con­fus­ing plans that don’t actu­ally come out to any­thing bet­ter than the oth­ers. They do have unlim­ited data, mind you, but we actu­ally use our phones for phones, and their “add a tablet” options are ridicu­lously expen­sive should we ever go that route.

Which leaves the other two.

Ver­i­zon. We loved Ver­i­zon when we were cus­tomers, we always had a sig­nal and never had a call drop. Of course, this was in the stone age of cell phones, and the num­ber of phones, the tech­nol­ogy of the air­waves, etc. has changed a lot since then. But we hear from the hoi pol­loi that Ver­i­zon doesn’t drop calls. The plan would cost us $150 per month. Adding a tablet, if we should go there, is $10 per month, per tablet.

AT&T. We have AT&T now, and when we first started two years (more, now) ago, we dropped calls like crazy. Not like, cray cray more-often-than-not crazy, but fre­quently enough that we pined for good ol’ Ver­i­zon. But I reg­u­larly use voice and data at the same time (look­ing up my cal­en­dar while on a phone call, for exam­ple), which you can’t do on Ver­i­zon right now. The plan would cost us $150 per month. And adding a tablet is also $10 per month, per tablet.

Research! Root Met­rics sur­veyed KC and com­pared voice and data reli­a­bil­ity for major car­ri­ers. The results sug­gest that AT&T has improved their dropped calls fre­quency a lot (borne out by our anec­do­tal expe­ri­ence), but Ver­i­zon still has faster over­all data speeds (and fewer dropped calls, tech­ni­cally). But mostly, it seems a wash between those two. Here is the link. Apolo­gies to those of my friends in smaller mar­kets. Also: ha ha!

There are two other fac­tors that will weigh on this decision:

LTE. This is the new supa-fast mobile net­work the iPhone 5 uses, and both V and A sup­port. From what I read, LTE only does data, and can­not be used for voice. Instead, both use the pre­vi­ous 3G net­works for voice calls. (This will change some­time, maybe soon?) There­fore, when an AT&T LTE phone tries to do voice and data simul­ta­ne­ously, it actu­ally drops to 3G for both. A lot slower than LTE, but you can do both. A Ver­i­zon phone with LTE, cur­rently can do data and voice simul­ta­ne­ously. It con­tin­ues using LTE for data, but fires up the sec­ond radio device for voice, and runs both at the same time. The jury is out on whether the iPhone 5 is equipped with two radios at once (I think Apple made beef about there being one magic-tasking radio in the iPhone 5 that did all things, but I don’t recall).

Research! Some­one explained the rea­sons why simul­ta­ne­ous voice and data are not pos­si­ble on all net­wor… zzzz, tl;dr. Basi­cally, what I said up there. If you really need to read it, here is that link.

State of KS Dis­counts. AT&T offers a dis­count for ser­vice to employ­ees of the State of Kansas, which we are. Our cur­rent AT&T plan has this dis­count applied. I would expect we could get the dis­count applied to a new plan with AT&T, which would make it cheaper than the equiv­a­lent Ver­i­zon plan (though I don’t know how much cheaper).

So, what do I need to do?

  1. Find out if the iPhone 5 can do simul­ta­ne­ous voice and data on both AT&T and Verizon.
  2. Find out if there is a dis­count for State of KS employ­ees for AT&T still, if there is one for Ver­i­zon, and how much a dis­count might be.
  3. Before Fri­day.

Update. Okay, so Ver­i­zon also offers a dis­count to employ­ees of the State of Kansas. So yay. Also, it appears from the Intar­webs that both car­ri­ers will be able to pro­vide simul­ta­ne­ous voice and data when you are on their LTE net­works. Also, when not on the LTE net­work, AT&T will still pro­vide that abil­ity. But we still have no ver­i­fied ver­i­fi­ca­tion of iPhone 5’s abil­ity to do this on Ver­i­zon once you fall off LTE. Not sure it matters.

Update #2. So, in this arti­cle, it unequiv­o­cally states that no, the iPhone 5 on Ver­i­zon will not be able to do simul­ta­ne­ous voice and data. Apple would have needed to add a third antenna to the phone for that, and they chose not to. The short of it, tech­ni­cally: AT&T does data over LTE, and when you make a phone call, does data and voice over 3G. Ver­i­zon does data over LTE, and when you make a phone call, drops to CDMA, but with too few anten­nas in the phone, they can’t keep work­ing the LTE for data, so presto, no data while talking.

Turns out it does mat­ter to me, so we’re stick­ing with AT&T. Also, the Future will be awe­some, and you can see how by Googling “VoLTE” (Voice-over-LTE), which is com­ing Real Soon Now. Honest.

Update #3. Ordered two new iPhones. Had to use the Apple site, because AT&T’s was borked, and had to order them one at a time, because the Store’s sys­tem can’t han­dle more than one car­rier sub­si­dized phone at a time, so, what­ever. They ship in two weeks, and take five days to ship, and may require a sig­na­ture. That’s… like, Octo­ber 3rd or some­thing. Arr.

No more twitter here

I’m done. At least, I’m done with try­ing to include all my Twit­ti­cisms on this blog. You’ll just have to go to Twit­ter to get them (see the footer for direc­tions). It was too… not easy, to keep them all here, and there, and dis­play them nicely. So, screw it.

But, here are all my Tweets. Some­one warn me when I start reach­ing 3200?

Son of a… blog

Not quite a decade ago, I forked over sev­eral hun­dred dol­lars to sup­port a lit­tle web host­ing com­pany that could, TextDrive.  In exchange, they gave me a life­time host­ing promise.  It was a good run, and they even hon­ored their promise across a cou­ple of acqui­si­tions and mergers.

But a week or so ago, they sent out an email to those of us who had sup­ported their ini­tial bid for funds, and told us that their life­time com­mit­ment was being “end of lifed.” We had two months to get out, or we could sign up for a free year on one of their new servers, with a $275 yearly bill wait­ing for us after that. Have they have gone from small pota­toes to too big for their britches?

A lot of the peo­ple who got this email were pretty pissed. (A support/bitching group or three have popped up around the Inter­net.) Most of them were clear that they would not be stay­ing. I just packed up my stuff, and with this blog post, the move is over. Every­thing now lives at A Small Orange, with whom I am pretty pleased.

Stuff is bro­ken (most notably the images on… I am afraid, all the posts) but those will get fixed eventually.

Here we go, again.

Password strategery is confirmed!

So, you all prob­a­bly remem­ber my rant­ing about pass­words here pre­vi­ously. Today i ran­domly came across Jason Kottke’s page of stu­pid pass­word require­ments, and he linked to an arti­cle by Thomas Baek­dal on good pass­words that says exactly what I said, only bet­ter and with more research. He also posted a FAQ later that answers the (mostly stu­pid?) ques­tions peo­ple had about his first article.

Baekdal’s post is from early 2011, and I’m still hav­ing to keep a crappy 8 char­ac­ter, 1 spe­cial char­ac­ter, no consecutive-special-uppercase-number-signs pass­word in the sta­ble, to trot out for bad, bad, bad web­sites I still have to deal with.

Arg.

Foodie gore is pink! (Or, Foodie-gore-is-pink!, depending.)

How I [watched] WWDC 2012

Inside base­ball here for peo­ple not inter­ested in Apple, but if you are: WWDC starts in half an hour, and here is how I am going to start out “watch­ing” the cov­er­age. Reminder, Apple hasn’t offered a live video stream of this event for years, and will not do so this year, either.

(The live­blog­ging is over, and this list is less rel­e­vant now, but it included Engad­get, C|Net, gdgt, The Verge, Phillip Elmer-DeWitt at For­tune, and Mac Rumors.)

And now it is over. You can catch the video(s) over at Apple’s web­site. Here’s a direct link to the keynote.

In the end, I was switch­ing between three cov­er­age sites, gdgt, C|Net, and The Verge, with an hon­or­able men­tion for Mac Rumors. Engad­get kept cramp­ing up and forc­ing me to reload the page. Kudos to gdgt, for con­sis­tently pro­vid­ing the best feed, and to C|Net for sur­pris­ing me with their solid, and dare I say, Mac-friendly coverage.

Dear Apple, do you hate my family?

Just “watched” Apple’s lat­est from their World­wide Devel­op­ers Con­fer­ence, and they announced a lot of cool things, but they have left me, in the end, worried.

In a nut­shell, Apple hates me (us).

Right now, we have one Mac, two iPhones and an iPad in the fam­ily (with another iPad on the way, we expect). We have music, movies, games, apps, etc. on all of these devices. (Note, “device” now includes Macs, as per Apple’s new nomen­cla­ture.) We have one happy Apple ID, and that Apple ID is tied to our ser­vice con­tracts for our hard­ware, our music pur­chases, our app pur­chases, and our device pro­files. With so many devices, you’d think we’d pay a for­tune buy­ing songs for each one!

But Apple (or the old Apple, at least) was nice about this. Using our one Apple ID on all of our devices, we could buy an app once, or a song once, and use it on all our devices. They all con­nected to one account (on iTunes on the Mac) and if I didn’t want the iPad (which the kids use a lot) to have cer­tain songs, or cer­tain apps, then I could choose to leave them off. On sub­se­quent con­nec­tions, iTunes remem­bered that the iPad doesn’t get Cee Lo’s orig­i­nal record­ing, that my iPhone doesn’t get Sesame Street Live, and that my wife’s iPhone doesn’t get Solomon’s Keep.

Apple loved me and my family.

But now, I am not so sure.

Every­thing they just described today seems tied directly to your Apple ID. When I get a new iPhone, all I have to do is enter my Apple ID and my pass­word, and whoosh, all my stuff is dropped in from the iCloud. And when I get a new iPad, whoosh! And when my wife gets a new iPhone, whoo..ait a minute. Does she have to have her own Apple ID? If she uses mine (ours) does she get all my (our) stuff? What if she doesn’t want that music, or those apps? What if I don’t want her (or the kids) to have that? Does all my mail show up on her phone? If we use the new iMes­sage (also tied to Apple ID, I think) are we just talk­ing to ourselves?

No prob­lem, you say, Apple IDs are free! She can get her own. And one for each of the kids, too! (And the dogs!) Okay, but then, does she have to buy all her own apps? Her own music? Has the gravy train come to a screech­ing halt?

Cause if that’s the case, you bet­ter betcha iCloud is free, buddy, since I’ll be spend­ing beau­coup bucks catch­ing all my “devices” up to where they were before the magic happened.

Here’s hop­ing they didn’t show us some kind of pro­file fea­ture in iCloud.