You’re watch­ing your hour-long drama/mystery/police pro­ce­dural show on tele­vi­sion, and your heroes engage in con­ver­sa­tion with a hith­erto unknown guy or gal on the street, who just hap­pens to be hang­ing around. Given that speak­ing parts pay much more than stand-around-and-nod-silently parts, you can bet your sweet plot­line that the guy or gal had some­thing to do with the drama/mystery/dead guy. It’s a dead give­away, but what are you going to do? Spend more to have a lot of red her­rings jab­ber­ing away? I don’t know. Do you have any suggestions?

 

2 Responses to Speaking parts ruin television

  1. mark says:

    Some­times it’s even more sub­tle, like the cam­era lin­ger­ing just a bit too long on some bystander who’s mak­ing a tell­tale face of some kind. I don’t know what the answer is, but in the case of my movie gripe in my com­ment to your Oscars post, I think the answer is clearly to use an unknown actor instead of some­one recognizable.

    The thing with the drama/mystery/police pro­ce­dural show is that the for­mula is so famil­iar. It’s almost like a com­pe­ti­tion at our house now: Who’ll be first to fig­ure out the entire plot? Some­times we nail it after see­ing only the open­ing vignette.

  2. Danny says:

    Lately for us it has been the unex­pected appear­ance of Bruce Davi­son. But just after the open­ing vignette, can you really be sure? Oh, you can sound sure, for the more effec­tive unset­tling of your oppo­nent, but can you be sure?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.