Hey all. So, I’ve been using Gallery now for a cou­ple of years. And with the new ver­sion 2, it has improved greatly. But I am start­ing to chafe at how much I need to get in and under the hood to make it what I want. So. I am con­sid­er­ing, just a bit, pay­ing for a Flickr Pro account.

Has any­one used one? Is it the end-all, be-all of web gallery keep­ing? It’s just $25 a year, which I can swing if I just take lunch for a week. And it does albums, and shared albums, and posts to the blog, and you can print from it, and it has pri­vacy set­tings… all the things I like about Gallery.

Plus it has the cool Flickr-y things, like the slideshows (Gallery’s slideshows are… well, they hardly qual­ify), tag­ging, pic­ture mark­ing, etc.

So. Any­one?

Danny.

Tagged with:
 

5 Responses to Anyone use Flickr?

  1. map says:

    I use both. I’ve just started using Flickr as a host for my blog’s images (http://flickr.com/photos/heet_myser/), and it works great for that (Gallery2, as you’ve prob­a­bly noticed by now, stores images dif­fer­ently than ver­sion 1 did, mak­ing it not so friendly for host­ing images in mul­ti­ple sizes).

    I’ve found a theme for Gallery2 that I really (http://nicheplayer.net/gallery2/main.php) like and that has some cool fea­tures. The slide show isn’t even too objectionable.

    That said, I like hav­ing both. I got in on Flickr when they were giv­ing away pro accounts in exchange for rec­om­men­da­tions, so it hasn’t cost me a dime. I’m happy to answer any more detailed ques­tions you have.…

  2. Danny says:

    I’m really pulling away from some of the com­plex­ity in my life. I think I would ditch my Gallery install in favor of a Flickr Pro accout, if it worked out for me.

    One thing I’ve never got­ten com­fort­able with in Flickr is the user inter­face. It has never made sense to me, it has never been easy to nav­i­gate. I can’t imag­ine it would be easy for my fam­ily mem­bers to navigate.

    I’m going to go read some of their own pro­mo­tional stuff, see if they can con­vince me. I’ll be in touch if I have any ques­tions, map. Thanks.

  3. map says:

    I’m really pulling away from some of the com­plex­ity in my life.”

    Oh dear. This doesn’t bode well for your home enter­tain­ment system. ;-)

  4. Danny says:

    Ha! Yeah, I guess it does. Though I’ll keep my TiVo. There are a lot of roll-your-own DVRs com­ing out, some already out there, that I just can’t be both­ered with. Yes, I dis­like TiVo’s Mac-come-lately atti­tude, but the thing works for what I want it for, and I don’t have the time to tin­ker turn­ing a Linux box into a home enter­tain­ment PC.

    As for the extended com­put­ing plan, well, right now it is pretty sim­ple. Had I the money to ful­fill the plan… well money can make com­plex­ity go away, too.

    Sigh.

  5. Lee Bennett says:

    Like map, I use both as well. I haven’t even upgraded Gallery to v2 yet, but its basic oper­a­tion is per­fectly fine for my needs. v2 should be all the more bet­ter if i ever get around to upgrading.

    My Gallery instal­la­tion is my pri­mary home of my sets of pho­tos. I use my Flickr account pri­mar­ily as my moblog loca­tion. I only paid for the pro account because I occa­sion­ally put some things in there that I don’t want deleted some­day later when I reach the stor­age limit.

    I feel like I wouldn’t mind using Flickr instead of Gallery except for two things. First, you might notice I don’t have many sets in my Flickr account. While I’m cool with a cen­tral library of my entire col­lec­tion in some­thing like iTunes where I can still sort by name, album, artist, etc. and make playlists that are sub­sets of the library, I’m still hav­ing dif­fi­culty hav­ing all my pho­tos dumped in one library with playlis­tesque sets.

    Sec­ond, I oper­ate my Gallery instal­la­tion on a server at home. Sure, my upstream band­width to host the albums to the world is just typ­i­cal broad­band upstream, but the albums are pri­mar­ily for my own ben­e­fit and usu­ally from home. So, for both brows­ing exist­ing images and upload­ing new ones, I get full LAN band­width for my orig­i­nal images that weigh in around 1.5mb each–and it’s not unheard of for me to put 100–200 images into an album. I’d not be too fond of the time needed to send 150–300 megabytes up to a remote server.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.